[dsnp-interest] Looks interesting

[=Bill.Barnhill]

I agree on the CRLs not being public by default, what about have them
accessible with a token? Perhaps OAuth?

Definitely agree on ability to restrict, and revoke, access to relationship
info.  That's a big part of why I love the XDI Link Contract concept.  XDI
is XRI Data Interchange, a spec being produced by the OASIS XDI Technical
Committee (I'm a co-chair).

I'm working on something similar using Link contracts, XRIs, XDI, and some
other technologies. I should have a web site up sometime before end of this
month and will blog about it when the web site goes up with my new blog.
Blog is  http://blog.communitivity.com but it just was put up so first post
on it will be this weekend.

=Bill.Barnhill

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Adrian Thurston <thurston at complang.org>wrote:

> Thanks!
>
> I haven't settled on the right approach to that yet. I think signing friend
> claims and using a short expiry is good. CRLs could work too, but they
> probably shouldn't be public by default. I like the idea of being able to
> restrict access to relationship information.
>
> Adrian
>  ------Original Message------
> From: =Bill.Barnhill
> To: dsnp-interest at complang.org
> Sent: Jun 19, 2009 8:57 AM
> Subject: [dsnp-interest] Looks interesting
>
> Nice work, looks like a very interesting idea.
>
> How do you handle revoking friendships? Using a CRL or some kind for the
> cert used to sign a friendship claim?
>
> Thanks,
> =Bill.Barnhill
>
>  _______________________________________________
> dsnp-interest mailing list
> dsnp-interest at complang.org
> http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/dsnp-interest
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsnp-interest mailing list
> dsnp-interest at complang.org
> http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/dsnp-interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.complang.org/pipermail/dsnp-interest/attachments/20090619/22291fa0/attachment-0002.html>