[dsnp-interest] progressing on networks (formerly called groups)
Adrian Thurston
thurston at complang.org
Sun Jan 3 20:24:06 UTC 2010
DSNP now supports named networks. I previously called these groups.
There is one set of named networks in DSNP. Each network has a
particular meaning and since the list is global, this meaning is
identical across all users of DSNP.
Examples of networks:
Social
Family
Work
Professional
School
When you become connected to someone you can then classify your
relationship with them by declaring that the connection is relevant in
one or more networks. All of your activities in a particular network
become visible only to people you have declared are in that network.
For example, if you are browsing the network called "Social" and you do
something on a friend's site (say Sarah's), then only people who are
connected to you and Sarah, with the connections declared as in the
"Social" network, are able to see the activity.
This is useful because we all know people in one or more capacities. We
know people who are co-workers and also friends. Or friends and also
family. The existence of these relationships shouldn't cause activities
to leak outside their proper social boundaries. You don't want a friend
seeing what should be private to your immediate family just because that
friend works with your mother.
If you do not put a connection in a network, that person still has
access to your profile, but they cannot see any activities that take
place in any networks.
It's all still quite rough, but the basics work and it is progressing
rapidly.
-Adrian
More information about the dsnp-interest
mailing list